Section 8 housing is intended to provide affordable living options for those in need, but without proper regulations, it can sometimes have unintended consequences in safer neighborhoods. A growing concern is that many individuals moving into these areas through Section 8 programs bring with them issues such as crime, drug activity, and disruptive behavior, which can negatively impact the community. Studies have shown that areas with a significant influx of Section 8 recipients sometimes see an increase in crime rates. For example, a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that an increase in Section 8 housing led to a 17% rise in violent crime in certain neighborhoods.
To address this, I believe it’s time for stricter regulations on who qualifies for Section 8 housing in these safer areas. Applicants should undergo thorough background checks, including criminal history and substance abuse assessments, and must adhere to strict community standards. Those moving into these neighborhoods should also complete a mandatory orientation on local laws and expectations to help them integrate smoothly. If tenants violate the rules, especially regarding criminal activity, there should be immediate consequences, including eviction. By enforcing these policies, we can help ensure that Section 8 housing serves its purpose without undermining the safety and quality of life in well-established communities.
While I agree with this, there are those who have a past history with crimes like this. Might I propose approval for them based on the time past since their last crime with proof of rehabilitation?
For drug abuse, something like 5+ years? Or perhaps random drugs screenings? The drug screenings might become a major inconvenience to those trying to just live their life, something like 6-12 months of screenings then that gets lifted. Drug trafficking should be banned permanently or have a 7+ year incident free plus proof of rehabilitation and 2-5 years of drug screenings.
As far as violent offenders, definitely need some rehabilitation and a longer record being incident free, like 7+ years plus referrals from their closest relatives, co workers, and friends to vouch for the change in their behavior.
I completely agree! This is a policy definitely in its infant phase so of course there would need to be some changes and improvements to it such as you mentioned. Thanks for the input!
Section 8 Housing should be temporary.
Educstion should be affordable and a means to get off dependency. It can help people who contribute nothing. Its like letting your child stay on the couch for life without ever venturing into the real world, Its not good for the parent or the child or the government / taxpayer or We The People .
Yes!! I know a couple of healthy 40+ year old men living in their family members Section 8 Housing. The person whose name is on the housing moved out a long time ago. They (the men) have been living there for over 5 years as their bachelor pad!!! And they both have good paying jobs!! This is housing that a young Mother could use to get back on her feet. Yet these 2 grown men are living there! Smh there needs to be a time limit!
