I am actively promoting women EXCLUSIVELY do exactly what you did concerning their children. Women belong AT HOME, being stay at home mothers, teaching and nurturing their children as God intended, and obeying their husbands, as God intended. Titus 2 KJV plainly teaches this and that there are great blessings to those obedient to these teachings. What are you raging out about and so up in your feelings about exactly?? Can you not see the feminist movement is satans plan to PUT WOMEN INTO THE WORKFORCE so that they cant be stay at home mothers as you are? Can you not see the feminist movement is one gigantic package of satanic horseshit? The satanic feminist movement is what gave women the right to work, to vote, to divorce their husbands, to MURDER their babies through ABORTION andâŚDRUM ROLLâŚTHE RIGHT TO VOTE!!! All POISONOUS FRUIT FROM THE FEMINIST TREE DARLING. You need to throw out ALL of the poisonous fruit and not ignorantly accept one of the âfruitsâ( women voting) as good. Go read Matthew 7 about a tree and its fruit and receive wisdom. Stop calling what is evilâŚâGOODâ and good evil, as scripture also warns.
Can you show me where i allegedly stated, âi hate womenâ Pat G? Christianity and feminism are oil and water, they are completely diameteically opposed.
I shared with you all that SATANISTS are the ones who funded the feminist movement. The same elitist satanic cabal that controls mainstream media and 98% of politicians. Satanism and feminism are one in the same. If you had a clue you would see that.
Women initiate 70% + of divoeces(which God almighty hates)
Women initiate the divorce 90% of the time if she has a college degree.
1/3 of women in America have had an ABORTION(which God REVILES)
The majority of women have murdered or support the murder of innocent children.
90% of the United States prison population comes from single mother homes.
95% of women are not virgins on their wedding day.
There are now MORE only fans porn actresses then teachers in the US.
90% of women dont graduate highschool with their virginity in tact.
95%+ of women associate themselves, as you do, with being feminists, which is satanism.
The PRIMARY reason women vote democrat is for âhealthcare freedomâ ieâŚmurdering babies in thier womb.
80% of debt is owned by women
Women as a conglomerate are not NET tax payers.
Women find 80% of men on dating sites UNATTRACTIVE, so they all fornicate with the top 20% of âattractiveâ men.
60% of couples now meet online.
Women couldnt own credit cards or have bank accounts ON THEIR OWN, without supervison from husband or father until 1974 FOR A REASON.
This is just a small list of all the HORRIBLE ATROCIOUS choices women make when left to their own vices. Women are more easily deceived, as God teaches in scripture, and must be supervised and have authority over them at all times, also as scripture teaches.
One thing you are right about is sin is passed down from the fathers set of chromosomes, not the mothers, that is correct, but guess whatâŚ
Every woman has a FATHER so she inherits sin nature just as men do. Jesus is the only one without any sin whatsoever, not you, not me, not any woman, not any man, we all have sin nature. Gods word, because of our sinful nature has given very distinct and clear gender roles to PROTECT WOMEN. Never have i said anythibg hateful about women, i have shares facts, you get triggered just like a liberal feminist would, and equate logic, reason, and facts to âHATEâ , and then you Pat do what the devil does, FALSELY ACCUSE. âIf i were a christianâ, your statement about me, acussing me of not being born again because your precious feelings are hurt. Shame on you to sinfully throw that false allegation at me.
In other words, you want to enslave women. You want to DICTATE that they do EXACTLY as YOU see fit. I CHOSE this. I wouldnât DREAM of telling other women what they must do. I will ENCOURAGE them to do as I did. I will ENCOURAGE them to take their children out of the toxic public âschoolsâ. I will ENCOURAGE homeschooling, homebirth, and breast feeding. But I will not FORCE them. Nor will I tell men, youâre a man, so you MUST become a garbage collector. This is essentially what you are telling women. You are telling us we have only ONE CHOICE in life. Thatâs slavery.
You do not speak for God. God praised the businesswoman who bought and sold land in Proverbs 31, which you are conveniently ignoring. You are conveniently ignoring the fact that God appointed a woman to be a judge over Israel: Deborah. You are ignoring that women like Lydia (a businesswoman) were doing Godâs work with His blessing and that of the Apostles.
Feminism didnât put women in the workforce. Heavy taxes did. Most women work to pay the familyâs taxes. You need to learn some history. Feminism fought to OUTLAW abortion. I already told you that. You ignore what you donât like, including the facts. Feminism sought equality before the law, not equality of station in life, or equality in private affairs. What is being called âfeminismâ today is not true feminism. If you canât tell the difference, I feel sorry for you. So I better feel sorry for you, because you canât.
You donât have to SAY you hate women. Wanting us to be slaves to YOUR view of how we should live is hatred.
Feminism PREDATES the cabal by DECADES. I also demonstrated that.
Do you know why so many women want a divorce? Because their husbands did not CHERISH them, did not fulfill THEIR godly role. Men by and large are USING women for their own pleasure and then throwing us away. Where did that come from? Not from feminism. It came from Kinsey and other sexual liberation fools.
Women REFLECT how they are treated. If a woman seeks a divorce, she is reflecting that she has been rejected for some time already. There are exceptions, but not nearly as many as most people might think.
You cite a lot of âstatisticsâ. Remember, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics! Your statistics are not only inaccurate, but useless.
Only one of my children met his wife online. And guess what! He SUPPORTS her in her career endeavors. She has chosen to become a writer. A very, very good one, I should add. Her first novel is a smash hit! And guess what! Itâs about MEN LIKE YOU! And what they do to their wives and children. My son and his wife have nourished their children unbelievably, theyâre madly in love after 20 years, and they treat EACH OTHER with respect.
About the only thing I agree with you on is that we are all sinners. Which is why I donât have a problem telling you that you are a wolf in sheepâs clothing, because you distort and twist scripture. You are also ignoring the verse that tells husbands to LOVE THEIR WIVES as Christ loves the church and gave Himself for it. How many husbands these days are willing to do that?
And by the way, Iâm not triggered. Iâm just stating the facts. Not for you. You wonât listen. Iâm stating them for people who come here, so they wonât be misled by hour proposal. I donât know if you are âborn againâ because only you and God know, and maybe you donât even know. I am saying your FRUIT does not speak of being a child of God. A child of God accepts ALL of scripture, not just the part he likes.
Pretty lame âoverlordsâ for censoring my response to Pat.
Lame some peoples responses have to be âapprovedâ while others dont.
I thought this was a free speech platform that was done with censorship
a most measured response
Obviously I donât know what you wrote. All I have seen is that they flag messages with synonyms for homicide in them. They always approved mine.
I agree with you. Bear has shown his true colors. Maybe heâs a member of the Quiverfull movement, which is actually basically a cult. Or something similar. Itâs also called âShepherdingâ. Everyone involved is enslaved to the leadership, which micromanages everyoneâs life. Husbands micromanage their wives and hurt their children. When you hurt the mother, the children are also harmed. I have no problem responding to his tirades. It gives me great pleasure, in fact.
My husband didnât have to teach me anything. I had the values I shared, which resulted in the decisions I also shared, long before he came along, and I knew him since I entered high school. It came from being brought up in a REAL Christian church. One that heeds the entire Bible.
Is Pat flagging my responses so my free speech cant be seen?
Youre a deluded clueless feminist Pat.
All feelings, no facts.
You think the feminism PREDATES the cabal which has existed for thousands of years.
Youre clueless about history.
I am not flagging any messages.
I am not at all clueless, and I have already demonstrated that I am not a typical âfeministâ as you think of them. I have not expressed feelings, only facts.
While evil has existed from the beginning of âtimeâ, the cabal had no connection to feminism until the 20th century. What you have shown me is a tyranny far worse than any cabal. A home should be a place of refuge for everyone, women and children included. You would make it a place where one tyrant terrorizes all the other family members. When the family is full of love, it forms a bulwark against the cabal, which is on the outside. You have clearly demonstrated that you are a tyrant. In what way are you any different from the cabal, except that your sphere of influence is limited? Youâd like to expand it to include all American women. Thanks, but no thanks!
Pat, even in just a few sentences you show your insanity. The cabal, this satanic cabal, from thousands of years ago âhas NO connection to feminismâ? You cant even debate correctly. It is literally impossible to prove the non existence of something. The existence of something can be proven, as it is very easy to prove who the major players behind âwomens suffrageâ was by following THE MONEY, FOLLOWING THE PAPER TRAIL. The same cabal that funds open borders, and sex trafficks innocent children, the same cabal that funded the âsexual revolutionâ of the 1960s, you know when all the deceived baby boomers became liberal hippies, doing drugs, Woodstock, you remember that history pat? Rockefellar money funded a big part of that movement to âliberate womenâ from christian values and christian standards of living. The 1950s nearly all women were at home raising children and not in the workforce. In 1963 prayer and the 10 commandments were removed from schools, soon enough hippies and âfree loveâ everywhere theoughout the 1960s and 1970s. This is very well known history. Again, David Rockefellar fitted the bill, the Rockefellar foundation funded a lot of this movement directly and through subsidiaries. Many of women who largely donated to the movement were widows of men closely tied to the Rockefellar dynasty. One big large nasty web. You are totally wrong there is âno tie between feminism and the cabalâ. You are 100% wrong, a satanic dynasty planted the tree AMD NOW LOOK AT ALL THE NASTY FRUIT. Another fact you are unaware of is the âANTI-SUFFRAGETTESâ, did you know many more women OPPOSED womens suffrage than were FOR it!?
"Most people are at least somewhat familiar with a few of the more famous suffragettes and their various actions in securing the vote for women. Susan B. Anthony, for instance, was famously arrested and fined for illegally voting in 1872. She helped found the National American Woman Suffrage Association in the U.S. with her friend Elizabeth Cady-Stanton. In England, Emmeline Pankhurst and her militant feminist friends, the National Union of Womenâs Suffrage Societies, participated in hunger strikes and committed property damage in the name of womenâs rights. But did you know that not only were the pro-suffrage activist groups in the minority, but that there were also prominent anti-suffragist women who formed activist groups in response to the suffragettes? You probably donât, because this is another part of the history of womenâs liberation that is intentionally hidden. In fact, some of the most vehement opposition to women voting came from women themselves. I find their reasoning to be prescient and compelling, which is why I believe it is intentionally obscured from history.
In 1914, the Nebraska Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage group published this pamphlet in response to a ballot initiative petition campaign proposed by the Nebraska Women Suffrage group. They quite accurately predicted that pushing women to enter the political sphere, and the womenâs liberation movement in general, would cause the breakdown of the family, division in marriages, and a lack of effort and focus on children and community, which had always been the main work of women until that point. They also correctly pointed out that women enjoy greater protection and privilege under patriarchy than is afforded to âliberatedâ women. They believed, as I do, that women are much more influential and effective outside direct involvement in governing. They also wisely asserted that the primary role of government is to protect people and property, and that men are the only ones capable of that task. Therefore, burdening women with a task of which they are incapable is inappropriate and detrimental to women themselves. Below is a copy of the original pamphlet from 1914 listing the ten reason anti-suffragists opposed the vote for women".
âIn England, The Womenâs National Anti-Suffrage League was fighting radical social change for the same reasons. They produced political cartoons shaming suffragettes as old spinsters and depicting a Great Britain without wives and mothersâ. Credit Rachel Wilson, exerpt from her book: Occult Feminism, The secret history of womens liberation". There were two opposing forces here Pat, one of darkness to destroy the Christian traditional family and one fighting to CONSERVE IT, CONSERVATIVES. DO YOU GET IT? A tree and its fruit is a tried and true biblical principle. Anyone can trace what began in seneca falls,Ny in 1848 to womwns suffrage of 1919 then to the âfree loveâ hippie crap of the 1960s and removal of prayer and 10 commandments in the 1960s as well. Then women coming into the workforce, out of the home when Gloria Steinham, a cia operative, pushed all the feminist propaganda full tilt on women in the 1970s as by 1974, for the first time women could own credit cards and have bank accounts on their own, and dont forget ABORTION, VIA ROE V WADE IN 1973, the previous year. Then guess what?? No fault divorce shortly after. ANY reasonable person reading my words vs yours can plainly see you are an emotional women prattling nonsense out of your triggered feelings. Every stat i presented is factual and any normal person can see that what i present is true in day to day life. You say " every fact i present is a dang lie". Its well known women file for divorce 70% of the time, ask around WHO FILED?? The average person can go check with friends, family, and theyll come backâŚhmmmmmmâŚmostly women. Then they read your blithering non sense and they know youre wrong. Its that easy Pat. Feminism has failed, democrats support feminism whole heartedly and its one giant ship about to sink. Back to stepford we will go.
While it is true that generally one cannot prove a negative, that is the end of your rational discourse. What the cabal funded that had nothing to do with feminism is IRRELEVANT to whether they funded the feminist movement or not. Furthermore, while most women stayed home in the '50âs, many worked in factories during WWII to replace men gone to war and manufacture munitions. Whether or not most women opposed giving women the vote is also irrelevant. Even now, most people are happy to be slaves. NOTHING you said in either message demonstrates that the cabal funded the suffragist movement. A bunch of historical facts on other topics wonât cut it. And the suffragist movement was strongly pro-family. It defended the right of women to keep children in case of divorce (men abandoning their wives and taking the children was common). It defended the right of women to own property. Where would widows be if there had been no suffragists? In dire poverty with no say about the people who rule over them. No husband to speak for them. The real causes of the breakup of the family had nothing to do with suffrage. It was Kinsey, Margaret Sanger, the eugenics movement, and the population control movement that brought about these changes. I am not just telling you about history I learned. I LIVED some of these things. I was involved when Wilma Scott Heidi, a tool of the population control movement, orchestrated a coup at the National Organization âforâ Women, by bringing in people off the street to vote for NOW supporting legalized abortion. I personally TALKED to Alice Paul, who told me that the suffragists were AGAINST abortion. She was heartbroken that the Equal Rights Amendment she authored was being used to promote abortion. As for me being emotional, you need to pay attention to what you are writing. Your continued ad hominem attacks, accusing me of emotion, all sorts of other stuff, is nothing but pure, raw emotion, clearly demonstrating that you hate women. You donât have to say it. It sticks out all over you. And once more, I make note of the fact that you are twisting scripture and ignoring Bible passages you donât agree with.
And one more thing: we can reasonably assume that approximately half the users of this site are men. At least 40%. And look how many votes you got. SIX. Looks like virtually no one agrees with you. This may be a fine place to rant and spew your hate, but youâre not gaining any support.
This thread makes my head hurt.
The OP attributea all of modern societyâs issues to women being able to vote, but I consider that a hell of a leap.
Problem is we as a society have stopped creating strong men. Morally guided men who do the right thing. And there are many sources for this failure, you cannot pin it all on womenâs right to vote, in fact, Iâm not sure its reasonable to pin in on womenâs right to vote at all.
I donât think all of modern societyâs issues stem from womenâs suffrage, but certainly that has been a civilization ending mistake for the West.
In the United States, the 19th Amendment has taken us from being a healthy Republic to anarcho-tyranny in 104 years.
What we do well here isâŚideology. This, and other forums like it, are wonderful venues for pontificating ideology and declaring that anybody who dares to disagree does so because they are motivated exclusively by âhate.â
What is not done well here, or anywhere else that Iâm aware of, is actually assessing results. Whether itâs federal agencies, or laws, or regulationsâŚor Constitutional AmendmentsâŚit seems we implement a âsolutionâ but never go back and evaluate whether the solution fixed the problem, or made it worse (looking at you, Patriot Act, and all of the progressive amendments i.e. 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th).
So here we are, drowning beneath 35 trillion in debt, being overrun at our southern border, and being ruled by an unaccountable kleptocracy where the rule of law is but a memory. And itâs because the majority of women consistently vote for the left.
Hey Revans what do you think about my comments continually getting censored?? I took a screen shot(below) of the comment that âis waiting for approvalâ. Happens constantly to me. âOoops we forgot to approve itâ!! People are RABID when it comes to protecting feminism and feminists
Processing: Screenshot_20241024-
192206_Brave.jpgâŚ
Great comments! Too bad they wonât be widely read. I had hoped this place, being new, would be different. Foolish on my part, I know. Time to take another black pill I suppose.
Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. Itâs amazing, really, to think that after thousands of years of Western society being patriarchal, after roughly a century it has become unthinkable to most that a patriarchy might be preferable to the mess we have on our hands now.
Iâve been advocating for the repeal of the 19th for about two years now. Recently Iâve found that mine is not the only voice crying in the wilderness. God bless you, I hope youâll keep up the good fight.
We just have to keep exposing the facts and exposing the failed feminist experiment and eventually men will snap out of it and well go back
