Regulate Dangerous Blue Light (health and mental manipulation)

Policy Proposal: Protecting Human Health From Damaging Blue Light And Loss Of Independence From Blue Light Manipulation


SECTION 1 - Executive Summary

The pervasive use of artificial blue light from screens, LED lighting, and digital devices is a silent but substantial threat to human health. Research reveals that blue light exposure disrupts circadian rhythms, damages eye health, and influences neural pathways, posing risks for cognitive, behavioral, and metabolic health. This policy aims to mitigate these risks through enforceable standards, education, and innovation, ensuring that our society protects individual well-being and public health in an increasingly digital world.

As the Constitution mandates the promotion of the general welfare and the protection of life and liberty, it is our collective responsibility to address these dangers to safeguard human rights and societal resilience. This policy underscores the urgent need for a phased, equitable, and economically viable approach, ensuring access to blue light mitigation tools across diverse communities.


SECTION 2 - The Problem: Blue Light’s Impact on Health

Physical and Neurological Effects

  1. Circadian Disruption:
  • Blue light suppresses melatonin production, disrupting sleep cycles and leading to chronic sleep deprivation.
  • Impacts on circadian rhythms are linked to metabolic disorders, depression, and cognitive decline.
  1. Eye Health:
  • Blue light exposure contributes to digital eye strain, macular degeneration, and myopia.
  • In children, the lack of fully developed eye filters makes them especially vulnerable, increasing the risk of long-term retinal damage.
  1. Neural and Cognitive Effects:
  • Blue light disrupts dopamine pathways, essential for mood regulation and decision-making.
  • Long-term exposure may lead to heightened suggestibility and behavioral changes, as revealed in studies on electromagnetic and light-based manipulation.

Blue Light as a Manipulative Tool

Research, including revelations from CIA programs such as MK Ultra, highlights how light frequencies can influence neural activity, altering thought processes and behavior. Emerging studies confirm that chronic exposure to specific wavelengths of blue light may subtly condition cognitive responses and mood regulation over time, underscoring the need for preventive measures.


SECTION 3 - Policy Objectives

  1. Establish Clear Standards: Regulate blue light emissions to scientifically determined safe levels.
  2. Enhance Public Awareness: Educate individuals about blue light’s risks and empower them with protective strategies.
  3. Encourage Safe Innovation: Incentivize the development of safer technologies and protective tools.
  4. Protect Vulnerable Populations: Focus on safeguarding children and individuals in screen-intensive environments. Ensure these measures address socioeconomic disparities, providing access to mitigation tools regardless of income.

SECTION 4 - Proposed Solutions

  1. Enforceable Emission Standards:
  • Devices and lighting must meet ANSI and ICNIRP standards for blue light emissions, limiting exposure within the 435-440 nm wavelength range.
  • Devices marketed to children must comply with hardware-based emission thresholds, pre-configured to prevent user modification.
  1. Mandatory Protective Equipment:
  • Require manufacturers of non-compliant devices to provide approved blue light filters, glasses, or screen covers at no additional cost.
  • Ensure equipment effectiveness through certification by public health authorities. Subsidize costs for families and schools in under-resourced communities.
  1. Educational Initiatives:
  • Integrate blue light safety education into school curricula, emphasizing its biological effects and mitigation techniques.
  • Train educators and employers on implementing screen-free periods and managing digital device use.
  • Promote the 20-20-20 rule (20 seconds break every 20 minutes, looking 20 feet away) to reduce eye strain. Incorporate digital literacy and ergonomic guidance into public health campaigns to reinforce behavioral adjustments.
  1. Consumer Transparency:
  • Devices must display compliance certification labels, including warnings for non-compliant products.
  • Public awareness campaigns should highlight the health risks of blue light exposure and strategies for protection.
  1. Research and Innovation:
  • Establish state and federal grants for research on safe digital technologies and alternative lighting solutions.
  • Collaborate with technology companies to create and market user-friendly blue light mitigation tools. Encourage public-private partnerships to drive innovation and cost reduction in blue light safety technologies.

SECTION 5 - Supporting Evidence

Scientific Findings:

  • Blue light directly affects the pineal gland, disrupting melatonin production and circadian rhythms.
  • Retinal ganglion cells are sensitive to blue light and play a critical role in visual and neural health.
  • Studies show that UV and blue light exposure can alter biochemical processes, influencing everything from hormone production to DNA repair.

Historical and Practical Insights:

  • The role of blue light in cognitive and behavioral manipulation is well-documented, from Cold War experiments to modern applications in screen technology.
  • Prolonged screen use has normalized unhealthy light exposure, with children absorbing more blue light due to developmental vulnerabilities.

Economic and Social Costs:

  • Healthcare costs related to blue light exposure, including treatment for sleep disorders, vision problems, and chronic diseases, strain individuals and public systems.
  • Loss of productivity due to digital eye strain and cognitive fatigue impacts workplaces and schools.

SECTION 6 - Supporting Research Sources

1. Circadian Disruption and Sleep Health

  • Chang, A.-M., et al. (2015). Evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418490112
  • Chellappa, S. L., et al. (2018). Impact of light-emitting diode-based light exposure on sleep and circadian rhythms. Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbscr.2018.01.001

2. Eye Health

  • Chiu, C.-J., & Chang, M.-L. (2017). Blue light exposure and its effect on retinal damage and macular degeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020479
  • Wong, C. W., et al. (2021). Digital screen use and the development of myopia in children: A systematic review. Ophthalmology Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100022

3. Cognitive and Neural Impacts

  • Cajochen, C., et al. (2011). High sensitivity of human melatonin, alertness, thermoregulation, and heart rate to short wavelength light. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-1900
  • Hatori, M., et al. (2017). The role of blue light in neuroendocrine regulation and behavioral implications. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.01.008

4. Economic and Public Health Impacts

  • Berman, M. G., et al. (2017). Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce blue light exposure: Public health perspectives. American Journal of Public Health. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303884

SECTION 7 - Implementation Plan

  1. Legislation and Compliance:
  • Pass state and federal laws requiring compliance with blue light emission standards within two years of enactment.
  • Establish oversight by public health agencies for device certification and equipment approval.
  1. Enforcement and Penalties:
  • Impose fines of up to $10,000 per infraction for non-compliant manufacturers.
  • Suspend sales of devices that fail to meet standards after repeated violations.
  1. Public Outreach:
  • Launch nationwide campaigns on blue light risks, partnering with schools, employers, and healthcare providers to disseminate information. Include outreach in multiple languages to reach diverse populations effectively.
  1. Support for Transition:
  • Offer subsidies or tax credits to manufacturers adapting to new standards.
  • Provide technical support and guidelines for schools and workplaces implementing protective measures.
4 Likes

Love this! I would vote but have reached whatever arbitrary limits which have been imposed. Not sure why there must be such limits.

1 Like

Incidentally, i am also making a case for the dangers of our radiating environment. Please see my two-part “Proposal for all Health Care to Adopt the Holistic Paradigm.”

2 Likes