Purpose.
To preserve the integrity of peaceful public assembly and reduce incentives that may encourage disorder by prohibiting the organized payment of individuals to participate in demonstrations, rallies, marches, or other public protests. This policy is intended to support genuine civic engagement while protecting public safety and order.
Scope.
This policy applies to all persons, organizations, vendors, contractors, and governmental entities operating within [jurisdiction or organization name] when organizing, recruiting for, or promoting public demonstrations on public property or within spaces subject to the jurisdiction’s permitting rules.
Definitions.
-
Paid participant / paid protester: any individual who receives direct or indirect compensation (monetary payment, gift card, per-diem, travel stipend, housing, or similar consideration) in exchange for appearing at, participating in, or performing actions at a public demonstration.
-
Organizer: any person or entity that plans, coordinates, hires for, advertises, or provides logistical support for a demonstration.
-
Demonstration: any organized public gathering for the purpose of expressing views, grievances, or opinions on political, social, economic, or cultural issues, including rallies, marches, vigils, and pickets.
Policy.
-
It shall be prohibited for any organizer, agent, contractor, or third party to directly or indirectly hire, solicit, recruit, arrange, or compensate persons for the purpose of having them participate in a public demonstration within [jurisdiction].
-
Organizers must disclose, at the time of event permitting or filing (if a permit is required), whether any financial or in-kind compensation will be provided to participants, paid staff, or performers, and must disclose sources of funds used to recruit or compensate participants.
-
Compensation that is strictly for legitimate, documented event-related services (e.g., professional sound technicians, licensed security personnel, paid event staff identifiable as staff and not participants) and that is not influenced by participants’ political messaging is permitted, provided such staff are clearly identified and excluded from counts of “participants.”
-
Violations of this policy may result in administrative sanctions including denial or revocation of event permits, civil fines, and other remedies as provided by law.
Permitted, documented exceptions.
-
Payment for bona fide employment unrelated to participation in political expression (e.g., contracted catering staff, stage crew) where employees perform recognized job duties and are not representing themselves as participants in the demonstration.
-
Reimbursement of reasonable, documented travel or accessibility accommodations for participants when paid by a public agency for the purpose of facilitating equitable civic participation (e.g., disability accommodations), provided such reimbursements are transparent and pre-approved by the permitting authority.
Enforcement & Transparency.
-
Event permit applications must include a declaration of whether compensation (monetary or in-kind) will be provided to anyone expected to appear as a participant and a statement of funding sources.
-
The permitting authority may audit permit holders and require documentation (contracts, invoices, payroll, receipts) to verify compliance.
-
Where the permitting authority has a good-faith basis to believe the policy has been violated, it may issue corrective orders, impose fines, suspend permits, or refer matters for civil enforcement. Enforcement actions shall be administered in a content-neutral manner and follow established due-process procedures.
Legal considerations and constitutional protection.
This policy is intended to be content-neutral and narrowly tailored to serve significant government interests in protecting public safety and the integrity of civic discourse. Any implementation must respect the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech, assembly, and petition; restrictions on expressive activity must be carefully crafted to avoid unconstitutional content- or viewpoint-based regulation. Legal counsel should evaluate proposed local ordinances or administrative rules before adoption to assess constitutional risk and to design narrowly tailored, viewpoint-neutral language. See, e.g., the First Amendment text and widely used guidance on protesters’ rights. Congress.gov+1
Rationale (summary).
The organizing and payment of individuals to appear as demonstrators can undermine authenticity of public expression, distort civic debate, and in certain cases increase the risk of confrontation where actors are incentivized for quantity or spectacle rather than genuine participation. Reasonable, narrowly drawn rules that target compensation for the purpose of “manufacturing” demonstrations, while preserving paid professional event services and legitimate accommodations, seek to balance robust civic participation with public safety and transparency. Legal experts and civil-liberties organizations emphasize the need to ensure any restrictions remain consistent with constitutional protections and narrowly target conduct rather than viewpoints. American Civil Liberties Union+1