The passage of this act largely depends on the level of public support and engagement it receives. If RFK Jr. is confirmed as head of HHS, he could significantly influence health policy, but legislative success will also hinge on broad voter and constituent backing. I believe this proposal warrants attention from RFK Jr. and his team, given its alignment with some of his stated goals for health reform.
Regarding improvements to the proposal, your feedback is invaluable. One suggestion might be to incorporate a mechanism for those directly affected by the practices weâre discussing to share their experiences publicly. This could serve dual purposes: aiding in criminal investigations and providing a compelling case for legislative action. Given the challenges with social media platforms like the dissolution of support groups on platforms like Facebook, itâs crucial to leverage other communication channels like Substack, Telegram, and X (formerly Twitter) to gather and organize this testimony.
The medical communityâs observations, such as those from morticians and embalmers noting unusual clotting, alongside independent research on batch analyses and adverse events, should all be part of this conversation. Including data from actuarial analyses and work by researchers like Jessica Rose can strengthen the argument for the need for such legislation.
However, one of the biggest hurdles is overcoming public cognitive dissonance, where many are still influenced by prior narratives. The evidence needs to be overwhelming, indisputable, and presented in a way that leaves no room for denial or gaslighting.
I welcome your thoughts on how we can better structure this proposal to ensure it not only captures the attention of policymakers like RFK Jr. but also effectively represents the need for change based on real-world impacts and data
You mentioned the word âdebateâ twice. And youâre right; thatâs whatâs needed. If once a month Congress provided a platform for a national debate on this or others issues, the truth would generally win every time. NPR held a debate in NYC where people allowed to vote regarding the Iran nuclear deal. The very liberal audience flipped their vote after the debate. Intelligent arguments were made and the most factually-based arguments won.
The left wants to (and has) shut down all debate. These debates need to be televised nationally. One a month on key issues would bring people back to reality and cut through the propaganda foisted on us.
Most functional medicine is not covered by health insurance and it should be. Medications only treat the symptoms. Functional medicine treats the cause of illness. Allopathic medicine is designed to get people on a medical hamster wheel and keep them there. Now they vaccine injure infants at birth getting them on a medical hamster wheel very early in life.
I have been seeing a doctor who divorced herself from the medicare nonsense after she had an accident and saw how doctors treated people - and she was a doctor! She does not take insurance and charges $3/minute. She lives well but not extravagantly. She does not have office staff. You can call her and she will usually see you within 3 to 5 days depending on urgency. She does not have hospital privileges. She can refer you to a specialist if you need one. She also asks you how much time you think you will need when you make an appointment. The 15 minute appointments are a stupid, ludicrous joke.
What is it with doctors who always want to be paid for things they should already be doing?
Heres a better idea for vaccine injury patients. Make the doctor who is suppose to report to Vaers pay the patient for not turning in the paperwork
Dont let pharmacies on the board of anything that has to do with medical doctors or health period. And if a doctor gets paid to hand out drugs, the patient should get the money not the doctor or split it 90% patient 10% doctor
doctors start getting paid by minutes they spend with patients instead of flat rates. Why pay a doctor 150$ to see them for 5 minutes!
hold the doctor and pharmacy accountable for the patients side effects from meds.
5)when I was a kid I went to one doctor for prinary care. He didnt give out a bunch drugs and always knew what was wrong. No specialist needed. So until doctors actually learn how to be real doctors instead of part of the pharmacy they should be held accountable for the patientâs health. And after one or two visits if its not fixed the doctor Should have to pay the patientâs time off work and gas travel to come see them.
Insurance companies provide a program that is supposed to allow consumers to decrease the cost of any medical needs that arise. Therefore, no insurance company should have a say in what the consumer needs or wants their insurance to cover in the medical arena to prevent, treat, or cure a condition, illness, or disease.
I highly recommend you hire a Functional Medicine Chiropractor to add to your clinic. Depending what State you are located in they have different scopes due another issue which is States should not be able to limite a providers scope of practice to less than their education level as it is harmful to the public to prevent full practice.
I donât know about paying to put claims on VAERS. That may get tricky since people could start putting them on VAERS to get paid. So there would have to be a way to combat abuse in that direction. But otherwise I agree with your points.
If you are going to pay doctors by the minute you are mimicking insurance companies. The patient is paying for the expertise not the time. If you want to pay by the minute into play then you first need to decrease the expense it takes to be a doctor from the education, insurance, equipment, staff etc. There is more work and expense involved than the face to face time with a patient. There is also decision making and notes on top of many other factors that go into treating a patient.
Patients are also noncompliant to providers instructions and can experience complicating factors that will not get someone better in one or two visits. Not to mention it would also depend on what condition you are talking about regarding how many visits are required.
Doctors are already liable. Thatâs why they are required to have insurance.
I agree with you in regard to providers being controlled by Pharm. That goes deeper into the Associations and Schools - donations etc. There does need to be separation in that area to get back to good old fashion being a doctor. But you also have Hospital monopolies in many areas of the Country which control what providers can and cannot do. If a Doctor wants hospital privelages they come under that umbrella. There are quotas in these large Hospital monopolies which are run by Hospitalists and Administrators not by Doctors. The Doctors are employees and they get fired when they donât meet the quotas for surgery etc.
In addition, there are standards of care that are set which Doctors must follow because if they do not when they get sued they are held liable by the Attorneys and jury who claim they did not follow the standard of care. So they type of care you are remembering was destroyed by these things. Doctors must follow standard of care and if that involves giving a medication thatâs what they are going to have to do. So this issue is bigger than a doctor.
I agree that Pharm shoud not be on the Board of anything also. I donât agree there should be any fee splitting. Patients would be drug seeking in order to get a cut.
I agree with your ideas. As a patient who a couple of doctors have come close to unaliving by using the big pharma diagnostic list and using it to match a medicine for me yeah it would be very nice to go back to case based medicine. I am not a lab rat they need to stop experimenting and actually practice medicine again. A patient can not be properly diagnosed and treated with only 5 to 10 mins with the doctor. I am self pay now and I only go to the doctor when I absolutely have to and canât treat myself naturally.
If you are self pay you should be using a Functional Medicine Chiropractic Physician also called an Integrative or Internal Medicine Chiropractic Physician. It is a specific type of practice. Or a Naturopathic Doctor. These are the providers who have been practicing this way for decades and keep people well. They spend time with you. It can cost more up front just like any new provider but the return is worth it and once you are a patient under care the costs go down just like any provider. Initial intakes always cost more because there is more involved.
Agree with most of your points, especially letting physicians practice medicine not based on coding and algorithms. However, I would also point out that physicians, nurses, and pharmacists lost a great deal of credibility during the pandemic as well. None of you need to be ârunningâ health care. Most of us will never trust your credibility again, ever. Stop protecting each other from the consequences of your stupidity and gullibility to agree with and push âtrust the science.â Many of you need to get out of healthcare and change careers or be prosecuted.
Definitely agree. Ivermectin is shown to kill malaria (a protozoan PARASITE) and other infections. Some parasites can also catch viruses. COVID-19 is a virus. It just makes sense to use Ivermectin, along with antibiotics, to kill some viruses or parasites.
Agree that healthcare professionals should have all stood up. At the same time a major driver was that providers were employees. They were not making the decision. They were following the requirements of both the government and employer (hospital). The Hospitals were getting millions of dollars in COVID money by the Federal government. In order to get that money they had to follow the protocols set by the government. I agree that the providers should have all stood up and resisted. We only saw a few compared to how many there are actually do this to the point of losing their jobs and having to fight for their licenses. So trusting should be based on what they did during COVID. Did they get injected? Did they get censored? Did they lose their job? Did they do the right thing for the patients regardless of the enormous pressure.
The reason for the doctor doing 5 minutes is the health insurance, a doctor will go broke if they see a person longer than 15 minutes. What we really need is a massive raise in medicare medicaid that allows for the 99214 code (longer visit) so a doctor can see 8 patients a day instead of having to see 20 just to stay above water and be able to bill medicare medicaid. Whatâs really scary is Dr Oz is taking about Advantage A- which we are thinking about NOT seeing folks with that- it sucks- so already RFKs team is screwing up. You are absolutely correct about taking big pharma out of medicine completely- the main way they accomplished this is âevidence based medicineâ- which allows big phara to dictate how doctors care for patients, instead of the tried and true with far better outcomes âcase based medicineâ. Donât hold the doctor responsible for what big pharma has done to the medical system. Also, we need to pay for Drs college , from start to finish. The minute they graduate, they need to have all debt wiped out- it is another reason our medical system sucks and we have doctors shortages.
