Pharmacist or pharmacy insurance!
1 Like
If you need help with your denials contact me at widdle9876@gmail.com or in my group which is a public group and will teach you why this happened…thx…… > > Medicare advantage sucks
The NIH doesn’t approve drugs for specific treatments this is done ONLY by the FDA. I went to NIH (which is more like a library with many studies you can read under many topics) and they have this disclaimer “As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.” In other words, they are approving nothing. Ivermectin has never been proven as an effective Covid treatment. It has many uses mostly involving parasites but not really an anti-viral.
Why would it matter the the doctor worked for Planned Parenthood? You do know that they one of the leading provider of women’s health care? Abortions are a very small part of their business.
Sounds good but there are diseases or injury thst do require medications to survive. Not natural things work as well. Yes can diets be changed and other measures taken, of course. But in the end both should be used
1 Like
Do not allow the INSURANCE. Company to override my doctor!
1 Like
You’re believing LIES! Period. As 99% are here on this thread. Society has been brainwashed to believe Rockefeller mainstream doctors not understanding they know NOTHING about healing the body or getting to the root cause (this was set up this way purposely). People truly believe in their “opinions” /“advice” because they’re wearing a white coat and believe they actually have their best interest at heart. If you were to follow Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Edward Group and many many others, you would realize the depths of deceit society has been fed. Good news is MASSIVE DISCLOSURES ARE coming … and EVERYONE will find out. And by the way, you obviously know nothing about Ivermectin. The TRUTHS that are going to be revealed are going to shock the masses to their core as they’ve lied to society about EVERYTHING! And I do mean EVERYTHING.
OOhhhkay.
You’re right.
The other 99% are wrong.
You’re anti-doctor but you want people to believe in the 3, uhm, doctors in your post.
Who said cultists need consistency?
Society has been brainwashed into having that mindset. Naturopathic modalities have ALWAYS been the ORIGINAL “medicine.” It was only until Rockefeller came into the picture and forced naturopathic medicine out making his petrochemical HARMaceutical industrial complex #1. Many naturopathic /holistic clinics were forced, at gun point, to shut down and all their records (proof of healing and cures) destroyed. These were the lengths to which the evil cabal wanted control keeping TRUTH from the masses (e.g. there has ALWAYS been a cure for “cancer” and they are the ones creating “dis-ease.”!). And the brainwashing began and continued throughout the decades where naturopathic/holistic modalities have been believed as ALTERNATIVE. I agree that both should be implemented, but only to a very tiny degree. The percentage of petrochemicals that should be allowed are minuscule in comparison.
What’s more, advanced technologies that have been purposely KEPT from us (we are behind approximately 1000 years) WILL be surfacing very soon as we are finally shifting into a new existence—a Golden Age the majority is unaware is coming. Unfortunately, most of society doesn’t realize that we have been lied to about everything! But all that is about to change as massive disclosures are right around the corner.
Because Texas legislators oppose PP and don’t want anyone associated with it in a Texas board leadership position.
As for me, abortion is homicide. Anyone who engages in or supports homicide is, in my view, an enemy of mankind and lacks humanity. If you disagree, let’s meet at your parents’ house and I’ll murder your mom for you. There really is no difference.
But what if there is no other pharmacy your insurance company will pay?
From your lips to God’s ears.
I’m not against doctors, I’m against the Rockerfeller trained doctors who are doing unthinkable damage to the masses with their highly toxic and deadly protocols. Big difference. All I can say to someone with your mindset and ignorance, who is so completely unaware (your obvious give away was using the word “cultist.”), is THE BIGGEST rude awakenings are coming to you. By the way, don’t look now, but mainstream medicine /big pharma and their mainstream “killing dens” ARE coming down. It’s already happening but I guess you’re too busy or too distracted with your illusion to notice.
Dana is alluding to some of the stuff I was. You should first RESEARCH! Sometimes the stuff is GARBAGE! I’m not exactly young anymore, and I knew some stuff I was offered was not even really decent, but it was the best I could get from the quacks, and some stuff I knew about was not exactly a quick fix.
For example…
The latest thing I got is to fix a problem DOCTORS created by giving me a drug for high blood pressure. Ironically, the main symptom. IT creates is high blood pressure. So because they determined I have high blood pressure, they gave me this drug that will DEFINITELY give you higher blood pressure if you go off of it. And it created 2 OTHER problems also. I managed to control one of the problems for several months, but ended up going back on ANOTHER drug. Yesterday, I went on a supplement, made from a mushroom, Beta Glucan, and IT seems to be working. And the kicker is that that supplement costs half of the price of the other product, after good RXs discount. So far, it could be a bit subjective, but it seems far better. There are a lot of OTHER things offered as substitutes, but so far only ONE of them works for me.
I had another problem, and my doctor prescribed an anticancer drug! I said NO WAY, and replaced THAT with a supplement made from BROCOLLI, DIM! It worked like a charm. THIS one was FAR from subjective, and I even had it tested at a medical lab.
And even the soaps that are out there are POISON! I had a problem caused by regular bar soap, and IT likely has poisons ALSO, but I replaced it with NATIVE Bodywash. That stuff is GREAT!
There are a few scenarios that come to mind. A pharmacist not only is educated about the human body like your doctor is, but they are also educated about how medications affect the body. Their knowledge of medication is superior to a physician. All good doctors consult with a pharmacist about medication.
That being said, one also should understand that all medications are a poison. That includes things like aspirin. These poisons create negative and positive side effects.
All medications are damaging to the human body. There is no way around that fact. If you are on very many medications, odds are high that some of them are prescribed to treat the negative affects of another drug.
I’m assuming you are referencing RPh at insurance companies?
In which case it would be the pharmacy benefit managers for your insurance that you are dealing with. These entities operate in ways I find to be very unethical. They will take a drug off the formulary to drive the cost of it up for example. They negotiate discounts on drugs as much as 50% of which they do not pass on to you as the consumer. They pocket that money.
A pharmacist employed with a PBM has a strict formulary and tier system they are required to adhere to.
For example, your doctor prescribed you Vimovo twice daily. When you try to fill your prescription it is rejected for prior authorization required. This requires your doctors office to call the PBM to attempt to get the drug approved.
There are a list of questions that the pharmacist will ask the nurse when she calls to determine if it will be approved.
For this example the questions would be something like the following.
Has the patient tried nexium before?
Has the patient had success in treating pain with NSAID therapy?
If you answer yes to both of it is approved. If one is no, then the nurse will be told you must try the cheaper alternative nexium first.
That’s a simplified explanation of how it works.
The formulary is created to control insurance costs to you. However, since Obama care, monopolies have occured in some places with the outcome we are seeing now.
Bottom line is that your pharmacist isn’t the problem. Your insurance company in part and your PBM are the issue. Reform to our health insurance is what is needed.
In regards to pain medication, the opiate crises was going on before fentanyl. However it doesn’t make it okay that chronic pain patients are suffering. The DEA is your issue there.
That might very well be her insurance carrier and not the pharmacist. Big Pharma has layman, not Drs or nurses reviewing meds and cases. The pharma company is the one overinding our doctors. Big Pharma is who needs to be rained in. Praying RFKJr can get that under control.
The pharmacist does and should have limited intervention power. When a doctor sends a prescription to a pharmacy, the pharmacist should run a check to see if there is any problem with the prescription (e.g., a known contraindication for that patient, or an interaction with another drug the patient is taking). If and only if a problem is detected, the pharmacist should intervene by informing the doctor of the problem.
At this point, I would make three additions (which may already be in effect). First, the above steps to be taken by the pharmacist should happen when the patient is actually at the pharmacy to pick up the prescription. This is because the second additional action is that the pharmacist should, upon detecting a problem but before contacting the doctor, inform the patient of the problem they have discovered and that they are about to call the doctor to confer on the matter. Third, what happens after the pharmacist notifies the doctor should depend on the nature and severity of the problem.
Within the third point, I would make three subpoints of particular interest. First, this may involve the doctor requesting additional information (e.g., a document) from the pharmacist, who should comply with any such request. Second, at no point should the pharmacist be compelled to take any action which is clearly dangerous to the patient (e.g., filling a prescription when there is a contraindication or interaction that could very quickly kill the patient). Third, in the event of an interaction with a drug prescribed by another physician, the other physician should also be notified and involved in the ensuing conversation.
Essentially, the pharmacist and their knowledge of chemistry and drug interactions is supposed to be a line of defense against an error by the doctor. In general, the doctor and the pharmacist should agree on a resolution, each using their specific area of knowledge to contribute to any discussion.